Ipriflavone in the Treatment of
Postmenopausal Osteoporosis: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
JAMA 2001 Mar 21;285(11):1482-1488 (ISSN: 0098-7484)
Alexandersen P, et al. pa@ccbr.dk.
CONTEXT: Data on the efficacy and
safety of ipriflavone for prevention of postmenopausal bone loss are conflicting.
OBJECTIVES: To investigate the effect
of oral ipriflavone on prevention of postmenopausal bone loss and to assess
the safety profile of long-term treatment with ipriflavone in postmenopausal
osteoporotic women.
DESIGN AND SETTING: Prospective,
randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, 4-year study conducted
in 4 centers in Belgium, Denmark, and Italy from August 1994 to July 1998.
PARTICIPANTS: Four hundred seventy-four
postmenopausal white women, aged 45 to 75 years, with bone mineral densities
(BMDs) of less than 0.86 g/cm(2).
INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomly
assigned to receive ipriflavone, 200 mg 3 times per day (n = 234), or placebo
(n = 240); all received 500 mg/d of calcium.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Efficacy measures
included spine, hip, and forearm BMD and biochemical markers of bone resorption
(urinary hydroxyproline corrected for creatinine and urinary CrossLaps [Osteometer
Biotech, Herlev, Denmark] corrected for creatinine), assessed every 6 months.
Laboratory safety measures and adverse events were recorded every 3 months.
RESULTS: Based on intent-to-treat
analysis, after 36 months of treatment, the annual percentage change from baseline
in BMD of the lumbar spine for ipriflavone vs placebo (0.1% [95% confidence
interval (CI), -7.9% to 8.1%] vs 0.8% [95% CI, -9.1% to 10.7%]; P =.14), or
in any of the other sites measured, did not differ significantly between groups.
The response in biochemical markers was also similar between groups (eg, for
hydroxyproline corrected for creatinine, 20.13 mg/g [95% CI, 18.85-21.41 mg/g]
vs 20.67 mg/g [95% CI, 19.41-21.92 mg/g]; P =.96); urinary CrossLaps corrected
for creatinine, 268 mg/mol (95% CI, 249-288 mg/mol) vs 268 mg/mol (95% CI, 254-282
mg/mol); P =.81. The number of women with new vertebral fracture was identical
or nearly so in the 2 groups at all time points.
Lymphocyte concentrations decreased
significantly (500/L (0.5 x 10(9)/L]) in women treated with ipriflavone. Thirty-one
women (13.2%) in the ipriflavone group developed subclinical lymphocytopenia,
of whom 29 developed it during ipriflavone treatment. Of these, 15 (52%) of
29 had recovered spontaneously by 1 year and 22 (81%) of 29 by 2 years.
CONCLUSIONS: Our data indicate that
ipriflavone does not prevent bone loss or affect biochemical markers of bone
metabolism. Additionally, ipriflavone induces lymphocytopenia in a significant
number of women.
|